学习啦>学习英语>英语知识大全>

GRE阅读考试的本质到底是什么

楚薇分享

GRE阅读考试的本质是什么?为了帮助大家备考,下面小编就给大家分享一下,希望对你们有所帮助!

GRE阅读考试的本质是什么?

其实GRE阅读的本质是逻辑+结构+观点+同义替换,大家先看看下面这篇文章,你就知道你和master的差距了。

同学们先按照自己的方法看吧!

Notable as important nineteenth-century novels by women, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights treat women very differently. Shelley produced a “masculine” text in which the fates of subordinate female characters seem entirely dependent on the actions of male heroes or anti-heroes. Bronte produced a more realistic narrative, portraying a world where men battle for the favors of apparently high-spirited, independent women. Nevertheless, these two novels are alike in several crucial ways. Many readers are convinced that the compelling mysteries of each plot conceal elaborate structures of allusion and fierce, though shadowy, moral ambitions that seem to indicate metaphysical intentions, though efforts by critics to articulate these intentions have generated much controversy. Both novelists use a storytelling method that emphasizes ironic disjunctions between different perspectives on the same events as well as ironic tensions that inhere in the relationship between surface drama and concealed authorial intention, a method I call an evidentiary narrative technique.

你是怎样看的,或者说你自己的水平自己知道。来看看我们是怎么教你的吧。

首先,你得区别什么是主题,什么是细节。

刚才的文章应该是这样看的!

Notable as important nineteenth-century novels by women, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights treat women very differently. Shelley produced a “masculine” text in which the fates of subordinate female characters seem entirely dependent on the actions of male heroes or anti-heroes. Bronte produced a more realistic narrative, portraying a world where men battle for the favors of apparently high-spirited, independent women. Nevertheless, these two novels are alike in several crucial ways. Many readers are convinced that the compelling mysteries of each plot conceal elaborate structures of allusion and fierce, though shadowy, moral ambitions that seem to indicate metaphysical intentions, though efforts by critics to articulate these intentions have generated much controversy. Both novelists use a storytelling method that emphasizes ironic disjunctions between different perspectives on the same events as well as ironic tensions that inhere in the relationship between surface drama and concealed authorial intention, a method I call an evidentiary narrative technique.

这篇文章的主题,我们已经给你们加粗了。文章第一句说的是这两本小说对待女性是如何的不同。关键词是不同的。然后后面的2句是具体告诉你,它们分别是如何具体的不同。

这2句和前面的逻辑关系是:主题--细节的逻辑关系。

或者说是总分的关系,Nevertheless一词表示转折,大家数同学也就仅仅知道是表示转折,我们应该知道在文章里,它转折的是前面哪一点?应该是转折了differently一词,所以转折后面的内容很快就出现了alike一词!

那许多同学看完alike这一句,普遍的做法就是又来翻译。可是我们应该清楚,alike后面的斜体部分是细节,它们在具体阐述这两本小说的具体的内容。我们清楚到这里即可。

所以文章的关键词就3个:

differently--nevertheless--alike

我们来试试做题

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to.

(A) defend a controversial interpretation of two novels

(B) explain the source of widely recognized responses to two novels

(C) delineate broad differences between two novels

(D) compare and contrast two novels

(E) criticize and evaluate two novels

这题你选什么?

2. According the passage, Frankenstein differs from Wuthering Heights in its

(A) use of multiple narrators

(B) method of disguising the author’s real purposes

(C) portrayal of men as determiners of the novel’s action

(D) creation of a realistic story

(E) controversial effect on readers

这题呢?不过你得思考一下,题目里得its代表什么?

3. Which of the following narrative strategies best exemplifies the “evidentiary narrative technique” mentioned in line 24?

(A) Telling a story in such a way that the author’s real intentions are discernible only through interpretations of allusions to a world outside that of the story

(B) Telling a story in such a way that the reader is aware as events unfold of the author’s underlying purposes and the ways these purposes conflict with the drama of the plot

(C) Telling a story in a way that both directs attention to the incongruities among the points of view of several characters and hints that the plot has a significance other than that suggested by its mere events

(D) Telling a story as a mystery in which the reader must deduce, from the conflicting evidence presented by several narrators, the moral and philosophical significance of character and event

(E) Telling a story from the author’s point of view in a way that implies both the author’s and the reader’s ironic distance from the dramatic unfolding of events

有同学会说最后一题好难哦。那么我们想说,同学,你有考过托福?如果有,应该知道托福阅读里有一道题目叫句子简化题。没错,这题其实一样的,在阅读里,一旦考到细节的部分就只能是同义替换,也就是类似于句子简化题。你看C选项和最后一句基本完全一个意思啊!

比如:下面的部分相同的部分用同一种颜色表示。

其他没有标出来的,同学们自己找:

Both novelists use a storytelling method that emphasizes ironic disjunctions between different perspectives on the same events as well as ironic tensions that inhere in the relationship between surface drama and concealed authorial intention, a method I call an evidentiary narrative technique.

Telling a story in a way that both directs attention to the incongruities among the points of view of several characters and hints that the plot has a significance other than that suggested by its mere events.

所以你现在知道,为何学生考完会说,通过这样的GRE阅读方法,再看GRE阅读,怎么感觉和托福阅读一样简单啊。

GRE阅读制胜法则:打“持久战”

教师指导说备考GRE阅读36套解析需要打“持久战”。掌握GRE阅读材料中文章作者对文章主题的态度以及文章的目的,离正确答案就越来越近,以下是为大家讲解的有关GRE阅读制胜法则的5个步骤:

1.解剖文章的第1段

积极主动地解读文章的第1段,阅读时尽量记住作者提出的问题(现象或观点),和一些关于文章内容的概念和词汇,如这篇文章讲的是生物化学,日本企业文化还是黑人运动。文章的论题是什么,作者想说什么?

2.在脑子里面形成一个作者思路图

在脑子里或者在草稿纸上画一个文章的结构思路题。各个段落的目的是什么,主题又是什么?再次提醒,考察的是你的答题能力而非阅读能力。你不必完全掌握整篇文章,了解文章中的每一个细节(其实,你也没有那么多时间)。相反,你应该只读文章段落的第1句,而快速浏览其余部分。当你“读”完这篇文章时,你就能对文章的结构思路有总体的把握。

3.通览文章时,留意语气词和过渡词

快速阅读文章时,特别留意段落开头或者结尾可能出现的语气词和过渡词。这样做有助于你对作者思路的把握,从而快速掌握文章大意。

4.停下来,总结一下文章大意

在回答问题前,花几秒钟总结一下文章的思路和主题。

5.开始答题

根据你对文章的整体思路来答题。将问题(或选项)定位到文章中具体的某个段落甚至具体的句子。这里,你可以比第3个步骤更仔细。

新GRE逻辑阅读考试更加注重学生实际运用语言的能力和逻辑思维能力的考察,所以备考新GRE逻辑阅读的考生平时训练时要针对所掌握的知识点总结和积累,不要盲目追求数量。

GRE阅读高度之感知精确性

要求精确性,最好的检验标准和考察方式就是文章的细节题。所以每一次GRE考试的阅读部分想达到全对是极其困难的。因为ETS必定会安排很琐碎,不起眼的小细节来拉开区分度(虽然这种特等难题的数量是非常有限的)。再进一步看,什么地方是文章最细的地方?一种可能就是笔者举的那些隐蔽的语言现象处。它们不仅在内容上延伸,结构上也处于被忽视的地位,所以容易被广大考生所遗忘。如果谁读文章,不经意间也能对这部分内容产生部分模糊印象,那么这个考生对全文的把握是比较全面准确的。笔者把这种现象概括成“主题最主要之所,细节至细微之处,皆可出题”,权当ETS的“两手抓,两手都要硬”。

解决方法

在GRE阅读技巧的授课过程中,预测考点,题型分析和改写理论是一个不可分割的整体。针对这个特殊的出题规律,考生必须在初读文章时就形成一定的敏感性,判断细节的重要性和出题的可能性。这个工作看似有点玄乎其玄,但是却具有重大意义。

其实预测这个方法是普遍使用的。在TOEFL听力考试中,最基础的技巧就是抢读选项。大脑中一旦形成了大致的预期和估计,对解题的帮助是巨大的。而且解题经验积累越丰富,这种方法有效性越大。新TOEFL改革后必须等对话结束后才出现选项,这样一来解题难度大大提高。

GRE中预测考点的详细理论很丰富。同学们可以在读文章时注意any, a和an, 名词复数泛指以及上文中提到的特殊标点,特殊结构和语气。反复总结归纳这种类型隐蔽细节的普遍规律,一定可以在第一时间引起警觉。高手对决,往往是在未出招之前就已分出胜负了。这同样适用在和ETS斗智斗勇斗体力的备考GRE艰苦过程。

本文从提出一个现象,列举了简单实例到分析问题本身,最后提出一点建议。整个过程中读者不难发现一些ETS出题的习惯和规律,也为GRE阅读准备中部分考生片面追求技巧的行为敲响了警钟。所以“读懂”永远是阅读理解的根本问题,也是永远追求的境界。希望考生在了解了GRE阅读的特点和挑战性后,可以静下心来真正从提升自己阅读能力出发积累。这样GRE带给你的会是真实的英语水平的巨大飞跃!

GRE阅读:如何领会作者的态度

1.社会现象.作者反对将社会现象拔高到阶级、政治、意识形态或超人性的高度,反对各种左派思想、革命主张和马克思主义。

2.文学评论作者一贯反对从政治或意识形态角度去解释文学现象或评价相应观点,作者赞同从纯文学标准进行解释或评价。

3.对于新材料、新发现、新发明。作者的态度以支持的正评价为主,有时会提到缺陷,但不影响主态度。

4.生命科学,作者一贯反对Darwin及其进化论,包括趋同进化观点。

5.对如下题材作者与我们持有相同的倾向。

温室效应(二氧化碳数量)。

臭氧层问题。

供水问题(淡水资源缺乏)、城市污染、沙漠化侵袭——环境类问题。

6.关于弱势人群或其他

有妇女题材、黑人题材、黑人妇女题材、少数民族题材等。有三种态度作者一贯反对:

1.仇视。

2.认为上述问题不重要,不值得研究。

3.认为上述问题已经完全解决。

4.作者态度:关注并盼望有方案给出。

5.喜新厌旧.过去的、传统的、大家一致接受的,作者至少不会给正评价。

GRE阅读考试的本质是什么相关文章:

gre阅读有几个选项

GRE阅读难点汇总及应对策略揭秘攻克阅读不再难

新GRE阅读理解方法攻略

新托福阅读题型变化

    469279